H1000 is on my wish listing of powders in addition. Probably the IMR Enduron sequence will likely be effectively liked and I am able to go to that for greater availability.
I have applied H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There usually are not many cartridges which i use it for as I feel generally to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can not claim that it will not do the job. It is just that A few other powders operate better for any supplied cartridge. As an illustration, within the 280, H4831 gave me great velocity and very fine groups with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. On the other hand, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, while the velocity was practically similar.
This has become the major reasons reloaders are admonished to make use of new data only; and to begin low each time you will get a new large amount of powder. You don't truly know (Unless of course the corporation informs you so) that your new lot of powder was even made at the same manufacturing unit since the powder you obtain a couple of years ago.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am conserving the very little I've remaining for tumble 2021. I would start out lower and do the job your way up, dependant upon what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
My knowledge would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the exact same pounds given that the extensive cut displays a reduced velocity.
I've utilised H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no variation. The only thing is the small Reduce offers you a little bit more space. Good luck!gun)
I have used both of those and made use of the exact same charges h4831sc and also have not been in a position to convey to any noticable variances with overall performance. the SC Model meters a bit smoother is about all. any reviews??
and you should put money into some new load data publications. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust over time. 4831 powder of decades in the past is not same as exactly what is available. that's why somebody serious about reloading properly can have probably the most present-day load data publications to check with.
WA I'd propose a slower burner which will give greater circumstance density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you are loading heavies very long.
locutus stated: I nevertheless have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which h4831sc flows through my powder measures smoothly.
VERIFY YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit promoting or promoting of firearms, ammunition, and similar firearm factors to minors. We’d like to ensure that you’re eighteen decades of age or more mature right before allowing for you to buy our web-site. Will you be h4831 vs h4831sc eighteen a long time of age or older?
It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Found a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six 5 shot group nowadays. It can be somewhat slower than H1000, but shoots superior. Thanks for the advice, It really is fantastic to know that I've received possibilities when just one or one other powder is dried up.
I frequently generally obtain the sc Model. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less resulting from shorter kernels and I feel makes it possible for a lot more reliable metering so considerably less time you take trickling in the final bit of charge to generate bodyweight. So basically the SC will save you instances
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Use a confined supply of Varget, plus a lot much more out there H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly completely, simply because that is certainly exactly what the rifles shoot the most beneficial.